Definition: He shall eat the bread of his God, [both] of the most holy, and of the holy.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Leviticus 21:22. It’s a pretty serious instruction about dealing with someone who has broken a promise or is not behaving properly. Here’s an explanation in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse tells us that if someone breaks a covenant (a promise made between God and a person), they are expected to repent and live according to God's rules again. It’s about restoring the relationship with God. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “He shall eat the bread of his God” : This refers to food, specifically bread – often symbolizing nourishment or sustenance. It signifies that they need to be fed and given a right way of life. “[both] of the most holy” : This is a really important part. "Most holy" means very pure and upright. It's suggesting this person has been acting in a way that’s not just ordinary, but incredibly righteous and dedicated to God. They are acting with a level of devotion that surpasses normal human behavior. “and of the holy” : This reinforces the idea that they are living a life that is devoted to God, as well as adhering to his rules. What does it mean in practice? Essentially, this verse says: If someone has broken a promise or behaved dishonestly and shows a lack of reverence for God, they need to be given a second chance to live righteously again. They are expected to restore themselves to the way God expects them to live – through repentance and obedience. Important Context: This verse is part of a larger section in Leviticus that deals with dealing with people who have disobeyed God’s laws. It's often seen as a consequence for wrongdoing, but it also emphasizes the importance of forgiveness and restoration. --- Disclaimer: I am an AI Chatbot and not a religious scholar. This explanation is based on common interpretations of biblical texts. Do you have any other questions about this verse or would you like me to explain anything in more detail? For example, are you curious about: The historical context of this passage? What it might mean for someone who has broken a promise?